Key Takeaways:
Employees spend an average of $1,268 on work-related essentials and needs.
Remote workers spend the least on work-related essentials and needs ($1,215).
Remote workers spend just 19 minutes outdoors daily.
17% of employees plan to change jobs within the next year for a new work environment, with most (10%) wanting a remote job.
Comparing Employee Expenses Across Work Environments
In this section, we'll explore how remote, hybrid, and on-site employees manage their daily costs, from home office setups to everyday essentials.
On average, employees spend about $1,268 annually on work-related essentials and needs, but this figure varies depending on the work environment. Hybrid employees spend an average of $1,313 on these essentials, while on-site employees come in close at $1,266. Remote employees spend slightly less at $1,215.
A deeper dive into monthly spending showed that remote employees allocated more toward utilities ($265) and internet ($96) than both on-site and hybrid workers. But when it came to home offices, hybrid employees invested the most, with their setups averaging $2,512. That's more than double that of on-site employees ($1,251). Remote workers fell in between, with home offices worth around $1,845.
Due to daily commuting, on-site employees naturally had higher car fuel costs, averaging $167 per month. Interestingly, they spent the least on groceries ($418) and dining out ($229) each month, possibly due to workplace-provided food.
Activities and Well-Being at Work
We'll next look at how on-site, remote, and hybrid employees allocate their time and how these habits influence their feelings about work.
On average, on-site employees spent 137 more minutes outdoors each day than remote employees, clocking in 156 minutes versus just 19 minutes. This difference likely could be due to the variety of on-site jobs. Some can include a mix of outdoor and office work, while remote workers usually stay indoors for most of their day.
However, the time on-site employees gained outdoors was offset by the time lost commuting. On average, they wasted over 15 hours each month traveling to and from work, a burden remote employees didn't have to bear.
As for socializing, on-site employees were twice as likely to engage often with their coworkers compared to remote workers. This increased social interaction can enhance workplace camaraderie but doesn't always result in higher productivity. In fact, hybrid employees, who split their time between home and the office, were the least likely to feel productive often at work, with only 52% reporting frequent productivity.
Employer Stipends and Job Satisfaction
Let's now explore how stipends are distributed across remote, hybrid, and on-site employees.
Hybrid employees were the most likely to receive at least one stipend from their employer, with 67% reporting some form of financial support. In contrast, remote employees were the least likely to benefit from stipends, with only 53% receiving them.
Among all benefits, technology stipends were the most common, with 22% of employees receiving this support. Notably, remote workers were the most likely to benefit from technology stipends, with 29% reporting they receive this type of financial assistance.
As for job satisfaction and the desire to change work environments, 17% of employees were considering a job change within the next year to achieve a different work setup, with many (10%) aiming for a remote position.
Only 5% of remote employees were looking to change jobs for a new work environment, while 21% of on-site employees and 20% of hybrid workers were seeking a change, possibly in pursuit of greater flexibility or different work conditions.
Weighing the Costs and Benefits of Your Work Setup
Whether you work from home, commute to the office, or split your time between the two, your work environment has a big impact on your expenses and how you feel about your job. Remote workers might save on gas but end up spending more on utilities, while on-site employees enjoy more social time but lose hours to commuting. By understanding these trade-offs, both employees and employers can make smarter decisions about what work setup works best.
Methodology
For this study, we surveyed 1,003 employees about both the explicit and implicit costs and time associated with their work. This means we looked at not only the direct expenses, like commuting and office supplies but also the less obvious costs, such as time spent on tasks and the impact on personal well-being. Among the respondents, 42% worked on-site, 32% had a hybrid role, and 26% worked remotely.
About Clarify Capital
Clarify Capital helps business owners secure the financing they need to thrive in today's competitive marketplace, including no-doc business loans and fast business loans . Our tailored financial solutions support entrepreneurial dreams, turning visions into reality.
Fair Use Statement
This data is provided for noncommercial use only. If you plan to share it, please provide a link to the source.

Emma Parker
Senior Funding Manager
Emma holds a B.S. in finance from NYU and has been working in the business financing industry for over a decade. She is passionate about helping small business owners grow by finding the right funding option that makes sense for them. More about the Clarify team →
Related Posts